anything like C++ references?
Christos TZOTZIOY Georgiou
tzot at sil-tec.gr
Tue Jul 22 04:03:03 CEST 2003
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:03:11 +0100, rumours say that Stephen Horne
<intentionally at blank.co.uk> might have written:
>You could make a very strong case for references being a distinct
>datatype from pointers
I think you were correct to say that references act as pointers *and*
syntactic sugar. Simply put, a declaration of a reference:
could be interpreted as:
#define c (*__c)
with a corresponding #undef at the end of the block.
This explains stuff like why one uses . instead of -> with a reference.
Anyway, this is how *I* interpreted C++ references once I met them, and
it kind of stuck in my mind. I could be missing something, though...
I'm more of a plain-C person.
TZOTZIOY, I speak England very best,
Microsoft Security Alert: the Matrix began as open source.
More information about the Python-list