recognizing empty iterators
mis6 at pitt.edu
Mon Jul 21 16:26:15 CEST 2003
After a recent thread on .endswith, I have been thinking about iterators.
I realized that I don't know a satisfactory way to check if an
iterator is empty. In other words I am looking for an
"isempty" function to use in "if" statements such as
without side effects. Here are some unsatisfactory ways of implementing
#1: converting to a list or tuple
return not list(iterator)
Easy, but one has to create the entire list, thus defecting the basic
purpose of the iterator, i.e. lazy evaluation.
#2: checking for StopIteration
This works, for instance
gives True and
gives False. However, there is a side effect: after the check, the
iterator has advanced of one step and now "it.next()" gives 2, not 1.
In order this to work without side effects, I should be able to restart
the iterator from the beginning, but I don't know how to do that.
Is it possible?
#3: comparing with the empty iterator
if it == emptyiterator: print 'Ok!'
This simply doesn't work.
I wonder if the itertools module should contain a function to check for
empty iterators, thus simplifying my life ;) Of course, I may well be
missing something obvious, if so, please enlighten me.
More information about the Python-list