anything new on the ternary operator?
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Mon Jul 7 15:37:06 CEST 2003
In article <u8yrak6zg.fsf at scientia.com>,
Paul Rudin <paul_rudin at scientia.com> wrote:
>I don't know the details of this process; but personally I think a
>ternary operator would be a very good thing - and don't care about the
>syntax too much. Maybe the right think to vote on was simply a yes/no
>to "Do you want a ternary operator?".
Nope. Many people who were in favor of a ternary operator were entirely
opposed to specific variants; that's even more true of people who were
neutral on the subject.
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Not everything in life has a clue in front of it...." --JMS
More information about the Python-list