anything new on the ternary operator?

Aahz aahz at
Mon Jul 7 15:37:06 CEST 2003

In article <u8yrak6zg.fsf at>,
Paul Rudin  <paul_rudin at> wrote:
>I don't know the details of this process; but personally I think a
>ternary operator would be a very good thing - and don't care about the
>syntax too much. Maybe the right think to vote on was simply a yes/no
>to "Do you want a ternary operator?". 

Nope.  Many people who were in favor of a ternary operator were entirely
opposed to specific variants; that's even more true of people who were
neutral on the subject.
Aahz (aahz at           <*>

"Not everything in life has a clue in front of it...."  --JMS

More information about the Python-list mailing list