anything new on the ternary operator?
lists at andreas-jung.com
Mon Jul 7 07:16:13 CEST 2003
--On Montag, 7. Juli 2003 2:13 Uhr +0000 Russell Reagan <rreagan at attbi.com>
> "Bob Gailer" <bgailer at alum.rpi.edu> wrote
>> I was looking forward to having it.
> "Sean Ross" <sross at connectmail.carleton.ca> wrote
>> - (if C: x else: y) won the vote
> I'm still learning python, so don't flame too much :-)
> What is superior about using the proposed ternary operator instead of
> using the 'and' and 'or' operators to simulate inline logic?
Please stop the discussion. The ternary operator is dead (which is a very
because GvR made the decision.
More information about the Python-list