file.close()
Ben Finney
bignose-hates-spam at and-benfinney-does-too.id.au
Thu Jul 24 00:06:00 EDT 2003
Bryan (original poster) wrote:
> f1 = file('file1')
> try:
> f2 = file('file2')
> try:
> # process f1 & f2
> finally:
> f2.close()
> finally:
> f1.close()
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:12:34 -0700, Erik Max Francis wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
>> It seems that nesting the 'try' clauses doesn't scale well. What if
>> fifty files are opened? Must the nesting level of the 'try' clauses
>> be fifty also, to close them promptly?
>
> If you're manipulating fifty files in one block, presumably you're
> doing so in a uniform way:
>
> allFiles = [...]
> try:
> ...
> finally:
> for eachFile in allFiles:
> eachFile.close()
This doesn't match Bryan's nested structure above, which you blessed as
not "overkill" (in his words). It was this that I considered a
poorly-scaling structure, or "overkill" since only one 'try' block is
required. Do you disagree?
--
\ "Too many Indians spoil the golden egg." -- Sir Joh |
`\ Bjelke-Petersen |
_o__) |
http://bignose.squidly.org/ 9CFE12B0 791A4267 887F520C B7AC2E51 BD41714B
More information about the Python-list
mailing list