Python as a Language Choice

Tim Rowe tim at remove_if_not_spam.digitig.cix.co.uk
Tue Jun 17 00:07:32 CEST 2003


On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:42:29 -0700, "Cousin Stanley"
<CousinStanley at hotmail.com> wrote:

>   o Free ... Open-Source ... Cross-Platform ...
Yes.

>   o Easy to learn, easy to use, and VERY readable ...
Yes

>   o Power/Punch ratio is fairly high ...
>
>        That is, get a lot of work done
>        in only a few lines of code ...

Power to punch yes, but I don't care how many lines of code.  I'd
sooner quickly write a dozen lines of nice clear Python than spend
hours agonising over one line of indecipherable APL to do the same
job.

>   o Very active and friendly development community
>     centered in comp.lang.python where one can read
>     and learn from daily posts by the authors themselves
>     of popular and current Python books and modules ...

Yep.

>   o Large and diverse set of Application Programming Interfaces
>     available in many areas ...

Not really a factor for me; I just as often use a plain text editor.

>   o Multiple choice for GUI programming ...
>
>         [ Tk | GTK | QT | wxPy | others ... ]

I only want one, but it has to be one I like :-)

>   o Core languange is readily extensible through
>     and embeddable in other languages ...

I must look at that some time.

One factor for me that isn't in your list is the extensive
availability of libraries such as numeric and the XML stuff.




More information about the Python-list mailing list