Algorithm help per favore
anton at vredegoor.doge.nl
Thu Jun 19 21:01:33 CEST 2003
David Eppstein <eppstein at ics.uci.edu> wrote:
>In article <bcshoh$kb8$1 at news.hccnet.nl>,
> anton at vredegoor.doge.nl (Anton Vredegoor) wrote:
>> Output from a test run:
>> zipped : 0.985 sec.
>> ranged : 0.425 sec.
>> inplace : 0.206 sec.
>Interesting. When I try it, what I find is that zipped is usually but
>not always fastest, inplace is a little slower, and ranged is
>significantly slower -- data at end of message.
Thanks for sharing this info, the data is very counterintuitive.
Probably programmer error :-)
More information about the Python-list