tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Jun 11 15:49:41 CEST 2003
"Roy Smith" <roy at panix.com> wrote in message
news:roy-B36181.09340211062003 at reader1.panix.com...
> I have to agree with that. I'm all for making stuff better, but if
> means breaking something that currently works, it's a bad idea. I'd
> much rather live with a few "historical warts" in the language than
> to put up with working code breaking.
Guido agrees and just posted a rejection notice on PyDev. String
exceptions will go but the current syntax alternatives will not, as
least in the near future.
More information about the Python-list