bignose-hates-spam at and-zip-does-too.com.au
Mon Jun 23 05:22:24 CEST 2003
On 22 Jun 2003 20:40:27 +0100, John J. Lee wrote:
> Ben Finney <bignose-hates-spam at and-zip-does-too.com.au> writes:
>> No, you only have to include "[...] the changes made to Python
>> 2.2.3." If you're including the whole thing, but not actually making
>> changes to it, then your "brief summary of the changes" is zero
> py2exe and Installer *don't* include the whole of Python.
I've never used them; hopefully someone more qualified can give more
> So, does that mean that all py2exe and Installer apps must include a
> note indicating that a) this isn't the whole of Python 2.x.y and b)
> the files taken from the Python distribution have been merged into a
> few files for distribution?
I(ANAL) would read that clause to say so, yes. I also believe you'll
need to include the Python license with any distribution of Python.
> If so, do people actually do that ATM?
No idea. I work in environments where executables are simply marked as
such, and where software installs to standard places in the path.
\ "Truth would quickly cease to become stranger than fiction, |
`\ once we got as used to it." -- Henry L. Mencken |
http://bignose.squidly.org/ 9CFE12B0 791A4267 887F520C B7AC2E51 BD41714B
More information about the Python-list