does lack of type declarations make Python unsafe?
donn at u.washington.edu
Tue Jun 17 18:33:50 CEST 2003
In article <3EEE7D4C.DA0B3512 at engcorp.com>,
Peter Hansen <peter at engcorp.com> wrote:
> Pah! We're not talking about a bunch of morons here, we're talking about
> intelligent people who might not have encountered a particular approach
> which could allow them to improve the quality of their output. Why
> would you think people aren't intelligent enough to understand that
> nothing is an absolute, that no process or language or generalization
> of any kind will ever be adequate for all possible situations? If I've
> said something that claims XP or TDD will work for everyone, always,
> then I hereby take it back, but I'm sure I haven't said such a thing
> unless it was in one of my 3:30 in the morning after a lousy few hours
> of sleep kind of postings...
He's not the only one who gets a message something like that
from the unit testing advocates on c.l.p. Without the hyperbolic
``all possible situations'', sure, but more to the point, does
the discussion usually acknowledge significant exceptions, or
rather tend to dismiss them?
Donn Cave, donn at u.washington.edu
More information about the Python-list