Summary of PEP 308 Vote for a Ternary Operator

Stephen Horne intentionally at blank.co.uk
Tue Mar 11 07:44:37 EST 2003


On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 01:24:17 -0800, Dennis Lee Bieber
<wlfraed at ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>        Whereas I felt the so-called official vote mechanism -- wherein 
>listing any option at all, even if with "reject" was still a favorable 
>vote for that option -- was so confusing it wasn't worth my time to 
>figure out.

I saw that as 'this is worse than no change, but not as bad as the
alternatives'.





More information about the Python-list mailing list