Summary of PEP 308 Vote for a Ternary Operator
Stephen Horne
intentionally at blank.co.uk
Tue Mar 11 07:44:37 EST 2003
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 01:24:17 -0800, Dennis Lee Bieber
<wlfraed at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Whereas I felt the so-called official vote mechanism -- wherein
>listing any option at all, even if with "reject" was still a favorable
>vote for that option -- was so confusing it wasn't worth my time to
>figure out.
I saw that as 'this is worse than no change, but not as bad as the
alternatives'.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list