Overloading operators for currying, a PEP309 suggestion
Jp Calderone
exarkun at intarweb.us
Tue Mar 11 13:32:47 EST 2003
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:38:41PM +0100, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
> Stephen Horne <intentionally at blank.co.uk> writes:
>
> > I would prefer defining the __len__, __getitem__, __setitem__ and
> > __delitem__ methods to allow direct manipulation (and creation and
> > deletion) of the closure.
>
> That would mean that the length of a function with no arguments is 0,
> right? That's bad and will likely introduce subtle bugs because then all
> functions with no arguments are suddenly considered false.
>
>>> class foo(object):
... def __len__(self): return 0
... def __nonzero__(self): return 1
...
>>> if foo(): print 'evaluates to true'
evaluates to true
Jp
--
"There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in their
home."
-- Ken Olson, President of DEC, World Future Society
Convention, 1977
--
up 8 days, 9:59, 8 users, load average: 0.00, 0.05, 0.07
More information about the Python-list
mailing list