Vote on PEP 308 (how to reject)

Jeremy Fincher tweedgeezer at hotmail.com
Sun Mar 2 23:16:39 CET 2003


Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters <mertz at gnosis.cx> wrote in message news:<mailman.1046632144.5492.python-list at python.org>...
> Gerrit Holl <gerrit at nl.linux.org> wrote previously:
> |Although it's true that if one rejects all, it's strange to have
> |to do this.
> 
> Perhaps Raymond will specify otherwise, but it seems to me that if you
> wish to vote to reject the introduction of any ternary operator, you
> could fill out the following:
> 
>     Q reject   NONE
>     Q reject   NONE
>     Q reject   NONE
> ...
> That seems to meet all the rules.  Of course, I guess this leaves the
> danger that a new ternary expression spelled "NONE" (for every C, x, y)
> will be added to Python :-).

The *real* danger, though, is that a ternary operator will end up
being added and your voice (as far as your preference for which
ternary operator add if one must be added) will be unheard.

Jeremy




More information about the Python-list mailing list