A suggestion for a possible Python module
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Mar 5 06:24:10 CET 2003
"Alex Martelli" <aleax at aleax.it> wrote in message
news:kO49a.5064$zo2.155460 at news2.tin.it...
> Terry Reedy wrote:
> > Does something as small as this need a PEP or would a feature
> > (aliased as bug report) or patch (obviously better, but I can't
> > one yet) be more appropriate?
> A PEP _accompanied_ by a patch would be ideal. (I'll volunteer to
> do the code patch, and co-author the PEP, if you'll be "lead author"
> and write the patch for the docs and the tests... deal?)
Yes -- if we agree on details -- and you make diffs from plaintext
'patches' if/when needed. For a start:
Lib Ref 126.96.36.199 Mutable Sequence Types
s.reverse() reverses the items of s in place (6)
s.reverse([i[,j]]) reverses the items of s[i:j] in place within s
<and add, subject to footnote renumbering>
The optional arguments i and j act like slice bounds and
default to 0 and len(s). The default with no arguments reverses the
Lib Ref 5.10 array -- Efficient arrays of numeric values
Reverse the order of the items in the array.
Reverse the order of the items, in place, in array[i:j]. The
optional arguments i and j default to 0 and len(array), so the
no-argument default is to reverse the entire array.
Possible PEP Issue
Q. Should this PEP be extended to addition of a string.reverse method.
A. No. In-place reversal is not possible, and extract and reverse is
already possible: string[::-1] extracts reversed copy of string;
string[i:j][::-1] extracts slice and then reverses it into a second
copy; for the rare case where this is both needed and needs to be
efficient, string[j-1:i-1:-1] will extract and reverse in one step
More information about the Python-list