GCD in standard library?
skip at pobox.com
Thu Mar 13 16:22:57 CET 2003
>> Tim Peters wrote:
>> For what it's worth, I'm all in favour of an enormous standard
>> library provided that
>> - it's really well designed
>> - it's efficiently, portably and robustly implemented
>> - all of it is actively maintained and can be relied on remaining so
>> for a good while
ALF> Absolutely. GCD, for example, might be easy to code, but where's
ALF> the harm in creating a fast, industrial-strength version and
ALF> putting it in a library?
Ask Tim about the cmath module. <no winks>
More information about the Python-list