[Q] Databases -- Gadfly vs Metakit vs SQLite
Cameron Laird
claird at lairds.com
Tue Mar 18 15:52:54 EST 2003
In article <%_Vca.92242$zo2.2429505 at news2.tin.it>,
Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> wrote:
.
.
.
>Let me commend and second this attitude: unless you have specific
>user requirements to the contrary, AVOID relying on closed-source
>components if you can. By using open-source components, and bundling
>them with your application if feasible, you may be able to make your
>applications more long-lived and thus more valuable, without being
>at the mercy of the closed-source supplier.
>
>
>Alex
>
Alex' sermon might sound prosaic, or even tautologous,
to many of the readers here. What's remarkable is that
officials from Microsoft and many leading organizations
*still* say THE OPPOSITE in public, apparently in all
sincerity. Their claim is that ... I have trouble re-
peating this with a straight face ... customers want
software suppliers who understand their needs, and will
take care of them. Open-source, they say, supplies
poorly integrated pieces of unknown quality, while only
Microsoft or a comparable large-scale vendor can supply
the high-value dependability customers truly desire.
I conclude, therefore, that there's a need for Alex to
continue to speak the truth as precisely and as often as
he does.
Microsoft: it's a national security risk (according to
testimony in federal court).
--
Cameron Laird <Cameron at Lairds.com>
Business: http://www.Phaseit.net
Personal: http://phaseit.net/claird/home.html
More information about the Python-list
mailing list