Vote on PEP 308: Ternary Operator

[Nick Vargish]

Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed at ix.netcom.com> writes:

> Nick Vargish fed this fish to the penguins on Monday 03 March 2003 
> 08:07 am:
> > It's confusing that I can list three syntax options, and either accept
> > or reject each. So, should I be a positivist, and vote in favor of all
> > the 'C then x else y' variants? Should I be negativist, and vote
> > against the forms I dislike?
>         Read it closely -- reject doesn't apply to the forms you dislike, it 
> only means "I prefer no change, but if a change /is/ going to be voted 
> into place, I'd prefer it to be this form"

Yah, you right. That just backs up my original proposition -- the
ballot is confusing.

Nick

-- 
# sigmask.py  ||  version 0.2  ||  2003-01-07  ||  Feed this to your Python.
print reduce(lambda x,y:x+chr(ord(y)-1),'Ojdl!Wbshjti!=obwAqbusjpu/ofu?','')