Rekall not longer available from - a fabrication

phil hunt philh at
Fri Nov 7 19:36:23 CET 2003

On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 10:50:20 +0000, Richie Hindle <richie at> wrote:
>> Your website ( says "The GPL version would be
>> free for non-commercial use", which is a contradiction. 
>> There's nothing innacurate or contradictory in that statement. After 
>> all, the GPL *is* "free for non-commercial use"; it just happens to 
>> be free for commerical use as well -- and the website doesn't say 
>> that it isn't, it just omits to mention that it is.
>You are right of course.  Let me be more precise (addressing John again):
>The words used on your website seem to me to imply that the GPL version
>could not be used commercially.  If that is the intention of those words,
>you are mistaken about either the meaning of the GPL, or your power as a
>copyright owner to control the application of the GPL to your code.  If
>you release your code under the GPL, it can be used commercially, and you
>cannot change that.
>(I vote Phil for pedant of the week.  8-)

Weeee! I get an award!

"It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than 
people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia
(Email: <zen20000 at>, but first subtract 275 and reverse 
the last two letters).  

More information about the Python-list mailing list