program surgery vs. type safety
Gonçalo Rodrigues
op73418 at mail.telepac.pt
Fri Nov 14 07:33:31 EST 2003
On 14 Nov 2003 04:17:08 -0800, tweedgeezer at hotmail.com (Jeremy
Fincher) wrote:
[text snipped]
>
>The main point, however, you made yourself: tests can only show the
>*presence* of errors, whereas static typing can prove their absence.
>
Huh? Surely you mean proving the absence of *type errors*. And on the
total amount of errors how many are type errors? Many people on this
ng have argued based on their experience that type errors are a tiny
fraction of the errors found in programs.
With my best regards,
G. Rodrigues
More information about the Python-list
mailing list