Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint

Joachim Durchholz joachim.durchholz at web.de
Sat Nov 1 13:44:05 CET 2003


prunesquallor at comcast.net wrote:
> 
> And most people seem to think that my `black hole' `syntactic
> construct', which does not type check under OCaml without the flag,
> but *does* under OCaml with the flag, can be unambiguously called a
> `program'.

I'm still hoping for an explanation on the practical relevance of that 
black hole device.
I don't insist that the black hole function as given does anything 
useful; if the black-hole function was just a condensed example of a 
general usage pattern, I'd like to know what that pattern is. It would 
help me to find out where in the expressivity spectrum the various 
languages lie.

Regards,
Jo





More information about the Python-list mailing list