rotor alternative?
Bengt Richter
bokr at oz.net
Thu Nov 20 13:25:29 EST 2003
On 18 Nov 2003 11:05:04 -0800, Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote:
>Robin Becker <robin at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk> writes:
>> It seems that the rotor module is being deprecated in 2.3, but there
>> doesn't seem to be an obvious alternative. I'm using it just for
>> obfuscation. It seems we have ssl available in 2.3 for sockets, but
>> there seems no obvious way to use that from python code.
>>
>> Is an alternative to rotor planned?
>
>Yes, Python should get some real encryption functions sooner or later.
>Meanwhile here's something you can use:
>
> http://www.nightsong.com/phr/crypto/p3.py
Just noticed your using time.time.
I believe clock has more bits than time, at least on windows:
>>> from time import time,clock
>>> min([abs(time()-time()) for i in xrange(1000)])
0.0
>>> min([abs(time()-time()) for i in xrange(1000)])
0.0
>>> min([abs(clock()-clock()) for i in xrange(1000)])
5.8666657726975935e-006
>>> min([abs(clock()-clock()) for i in xrange(1000)])
5.866665771847579e-006
>>> min([abs(clock()-clock()) for i in xrange(1000)])
5.866665771847579e-006
I don't know if it's worth anything, but the change would be easy ;-)
Regards,
Bengt Richter
More information about the Python-list
mailing list