python a bust?
amk at amk.ca
Fri Nov 14 13:28:24 CET 2003
On 14 Nov 2003 03:19:49 -0800,
Anand Pillai <pythonguy at Hotpop.com> wrote:
> I would prefer to see more books on Python though they all might
> be useless from a pure techie point of view. Let us have
Consider two situations:
1) There are four introductory Python books. All sell X copies; the
publishers make money and are happy.
2) There are twelve introductory Python books. All sell X/3 copies;
the publishers lose money and let them go out of print. (Example: the
O'Reilly Python Standard Library book.)
There's a finite number of dollars being spent on general Python books; no
point in having 15 titles chasing after the same market. The recent run of
topic-specific books is very heartening, however.
More information about the Python-list