Newcomer struggling with tutorial

[Gerrit Holl]

CPK Smithies wrote:
> Perhaps some people enjoy mastering quirks like these. I just see it as a 
> source of confusion and errors. What's so terrible about having to type "(a 
> < b) && (b == c)" if that's what is intended? Is it really worth 
> sacrificing a logical grammar for the sake of a few keystrokes? So it's not 
> a bug in implementation that I'm talking about. It's a bug in the design.

It is analogous to a<b<c being equivalent to a<b and b<c. I find it logical
and don't expect different, because they have equal priority.

Gerrit.

-- 
200. If a man knock out the teeth of his equal, his teeth shall be
knocked out.
        -- 1780 BC, Hammurabi, Code of Law
--
Asperger Syndroom - een persoonlijke benadering:
	http://people.nl.linux.org/~gerrit/
Kom in verzet tegen dit kabinet:
	http://www.sp.nl/