True
Peter Otten
__peter__ at web.de
Mon Oct 20 06:09:45 EDT 2003
Andrew Bennetts wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 08:17:15AM -0700, David Eppstein wrote:
>> In article <3f929cf0$1_1 at themost.net>,
>> "Paul Watson" <pwatson at redlinec.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Then, what is the best way to write boolean operations for Python 2.1
>> > so that it will be as 2.3+ ready as possible?
>>
>> I've been including the following at the start of some of my code:
>>
>> if 'True' not in globals():
>> globals()['True'] = not None
>> globals()['False'] = not True
>
> Why not simply:
>
> try:
> True
> except NameError:
> True = (1 == 1) # or not None, if you prefer
> False = not True
>
> Or were you trying to change the __builtins__ by using globals()?
>
> -Andrew.
I suppose David tries to avoid a syntax error raised by the assignment
True = somethingElse
in a future version of Python. Therefore he has "hidden" the builtins to be
assigned from the compiler by turning them into strings.
Peter
More information about the Python-list
mailing list