Tip: Windows internals using wmi
Tim Golden
tim.golden at viacom-outdoor.co.uk
Wed Oct 8 04:15:43 EDT 2003
"Colin Brown" <cbrown at metservice.com> wrote in message news:<3f831c27 at news.iconz.co.nz>...
> Thanks for your comments Tim. Sadly I find myself in the same position
> as yourself with regard to need and time to investigate this further.
>
> I note that there is a third article in WMI Scripting Primer's:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnclinic/ht
> ml/scripting06112002.asp
>
> which states:
> "Modifying the Properties of a Managed Resource
> In Windows 2000, WMI is primarily a read-only technology. Of the 4,395
> properties defined in the Windows 2000 root\cimv2 namespace, only 39
> properties are writeable. Those numbers improve in Microsoft® Windows® XP,
> where 145 of approximately 6560 properties are writeable. And the numbers
> get even better in Windows Server 2003."
>
> It appears to be evolving technology, currently targetted more at inspection
> than management!
>
> Colin Brown
> PyNZ
Interesting indeed. Further investigation
(which I *really* didn't have the time to do!)
threw up several articles by Microsoft which
talked about having to compile / set something
up / register COM services / other arcane stuff
in order to use the Registry provider.
I can't lay my hands on the URL (and it would
have changed by the time you read this) but it
put me off somewhat -- also, I can't understand
why they didn't just build it in from the start:
it's not as though the Registry is some little-used
backwater of the Operating System!
If you come across anything useful, or find the
energy to get something working with this, let me
know.
Thanks. TJG
More information about the Python-list
mailing list