Python from Wise Guy's Viewpoint

[james anderson]

Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> 
> james anderson wrote:
> 
> 
> No way to define an opaque type. AFAIK, modern Lisps allow user-defined
> types, but they offer no way to protect them against inspecting their
> internals. I'd prefer to have at least a grain of information hiding...

unless the writer is willing to me more specific, i suggest that the most
significant term in the above paragraph is "AFAIK".

> 
> Regards,
> Jo