Boolean confusion

[John Roth]

"Alex Martelli" <aleax at aleax.it> wrote in message
news:q%zob.75527$e5.2773846 at news1.tin.it...
> John Roth wrote:
>    ...
> > You're right. Section 5.9 says this, and directly contradicts
> > section 5.14 as well. 5.14 shows "in" as having a lower
> > priority than "==", while the verbiage n 5.9 says they
> > have the same priority.
> >
> > One or the other should be corrected.
>
> Can you please post this as a docs bug to sourceforge?  Thanks!

Done for 2.2.3. Also noted that it's probably still a problem
with 2.3.2, but I haven't checked it out.

John Roth
>
>
> Alex
>