Disagree with proposed 2.4 behavior for %x formatting of signed i nts
Bengt Richter
bokr at oz.net
Tue Sep 9 20:14:13 EDT 2003
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 20:11:09 +0200, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?= <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>Tim Roberts wrote:
>
>> You do not understand correctly. This is what will happen:
>>
>>
>>>>>print "0x%08X" % -1041053949
>>
>> 0x-3E0D38FD
>
>Actually, what *will* happen is
>
>-0x3E0D38FD
>
Really? In that case, would
print "@#%08X" % -1041053949
produce
-@#3E0D38FD
??
>
>Indeed. You can still do all binary manipulations that you want to do.
>
But reasonably?
Regards,
Bengt Richter
More information about the Python-list
mailing list