When did Windows start accepting forward slash as a path separator?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ at $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.co.uk
Sat Sep 27 11:09:53 CEST 2003
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:03:10 GMT, "Andrew Dalke"
<adalke at mindspring.com> wrote:
>> At one time, it was accepted as a truism that Windows (like MS-DOS)
>> was different from Unix because Windows used the backslash as the path
>> separator character, whereas Unix used the forward slash.
>It was? My copy of Norton's Guide to the IBM PC makes
>the explicit statement that directories were directly influenced by
>unix. I actually regard this as a point of similarity. The character
>used is a minor issue.
Directly influenced, yes - but as DOS 1 didn't have subdirectories but
did have options marked with '/', the unix subdirectories couldn't be
duplicated exactly in DOS 2. The character used *is* a minor issue,
but it is still a difference - what Stephen Ferg wrote is, I believe,
Even if DOS was internally happy to accept '/' as a path separator,
still the 'accepted as a truism' bit rings true to me - what is
accepted as an obvious truth is not always actually true, and to most
people users DOS was the command line and Windows was just a shell on
top of DOS - the 'truism' was what people could see, not what was
hidden away in the INT 21h calls that only programmers cared about.
steve at ninereeds dot fsnet dot co dot uk
More information about the Python-list