@decorator syntax is sugar, but for what exactly?
anthonybaxter at gmail.com
Sun Aug 8 10:24:58 CEST 2004
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:24:45 -0400, Robert <catcher at linuxmail.org> wrote:
> I have read a few Python blogs and not a one is taking the decorator syntax
> in a good way.
Most of the posts I read seemed to be from people having a visceral
response to the syntax. I think it's fair to say that many of the people
complaining about the syntax have not actually downloaded the alpha
and tried out the new decorators in actual code.
> The Python of 1.5.2 simplicity will be long gone.
The "Python of 1.5.2 simplicitly" is long, long gone. I don't agree that
newer Python's are somehow worse because new things have been
added. A short list:
new style classes
In many cases, these new features actually lead to smaller, simpler
code. I challenge _anyone_ to tell me that
apply(func, args, kwargs)
is better than
More information about the Python-list