Decorator syntax

[Peter Hansen]

Edward K. Ream wrote:

>>Anyway, check the past discussions before going back around
>>the same arguments yet again.
> 
> And exactly how is one supposed to do this?  I would have thought the pep
> would be the place to start, but pep 318 is actively misleading as to the
> state of the project.

I'm pretty sure it would involve using Google Groups and keywords
such as "decorator syntax", but I haven't personally tried.  I can
provide remedial instruction to those who try the above and
variations on it but who are still unable to find *any* past
discussions of this topic. ;-)

-Peter