A decorator syntax not yet mentioned (I think!)

[Neil Hodgson]

Peter Hansen:
> paolo veronelli wrote:
>
> > This 'old' method doesn't allow to prepone it,I think a statement was
> > the way to allow this ,but why impone it?
>
> Sorry, that's not English, and I'm afraid I can't infer what
> you mean by "prepone" and "impone"...

   I thought it was an inversion of "postpone" by someone that thought
English was more regular than it is. Trying to differentiate the three
decorator positions relative to "def": before, in, and after.

   Neil