Why isn't XUL more popular?
jbperez808 at wahoo.com
Fri Aug 20 13:18:30 CEST 2004
Whoops... stray post from netscape.public.dev.xul...
Jon Perez wrote:
> I find DOM to be unnecessarily verbose. It looks very much like a
> bloated design-by-a-committee rather than a lean, mean spec designed by a
> few sharp minds. It takes way too many calls to do something simple
> and the proper calls to use are non-obvious to a beginner. It is really
> not that hard to imagine having a simpler API for manipulating XML.
> now and while I'm quite deep into DOM (For example, I have developed a
> technique to dynamically load/modify any part of a webpage from a remote
> data source without reloading the entire page. A much tougher task than
> for 'voodoo' techniques), I must say I have never grown to love this API.
> Among the many XML-manipulation libraries available for Python are two
> or three DOM implentations. Despite my long experience with DOM under
> pythonic(*) ElementTree... waaaay easier to deal with. Too bad it or a
> similar API is not available for doing DHTML. :-(
> (*) 'pythonic' is roughly translated as meaning quick to learn (one
> sitting), easy to use (e.g. small, easy-to-remember API) and powerful
> at the same time.
More information about the Python-list