Alternative decorator syntax decision
ptmcg at austin.rr._bogus_.com
Fri Aug 20 16:00:11 CEST 2004
"Ville Vainio" <ville at spammers.com> wrote in message
news:du7hdqyxezw.fsf at mozart.cc.tut.fi...
> >>>>> "Paul" == Paul McGuire <ptmcg at austin.rr._bogus_.com> writes:
> Paul> (And let's hope we get at least as good a response as the
> Paul> thread!)
> Not going to happen, with the words "alternative decorator syntax" in
> the subject. No sensible person wants to see yet another wacky
> alternative, and the subject promises as much.
> Hence, I won't vote yet because, at minimum, you need a better subject
> Something like this needs to be announced somewhere (e.g. daily
> Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb
I'm afraid I have to agree, the subject is a poor one. I noticed that
yesterday as the responses were slow to come in. Something more on the
order of "READ THIS - IT'S FREAKIN' IMPORTANT!" is surely warranted.
I am still relatively new to Usenet, and surely not aware of how to update
the subject of an existing post, otherwise I would have done so!
But please don't abstain in voting over my poor judgment in titling this
thread, the responses are starting to trickle in (there was already a
cross-mention on python-dev). And I would not at all be offended if you
posted an additional note with some more-appropriate subject, directing
people to this process.
More information about the Python-list