[PATCH] RE: J2 decorator grammar

[Michael Sparks]

Michael Sparks wrote:
> Anthony Baxter wrote:
...
>> Well, in the comments for that patch, I listed all of the files changed
>> by the @syntax - that at least gives you a 'to-do list' to work through.

This was extremely useful BTW - thanks !

>> Once you've got what you think is the complete set, create a patch and
>> post it to SF.
> 
> Will do.

The new patch can be found here:

   * http://www.python.org/sf/1013835

Issues with this patch are:
   * Uses "decorate" keyword rather than "using" (personal preference based
     on reading everyone's arguments in favour of it, and also based on
     googling for existing usage of alternatives...).
   * Doesn't support suggested short form
   * Is a patch against 2.4a2 not CVS head.
   * A bunch of tests are skipped on my machine so I haven't yet checked
     those for @pie decorators.

As a result I'll be posting at least one update to this patch.

It does however pass all the tests, include docs, and all the bits I think
should've be updated are updated. (see the patch page above for details)

Regards,


Michael.