Call for signatories for J2
ajsiegel at optonline.com
Mon Aug 30 19:01:49 CEST 2004
"Robert Brewer" <fumanchu at amor.org> wrote in message
news:mailman.2584.1093824257.5135.python-list at python.org...
> With some commitment.
> I have not read the J2 psper...
>>Let me know when you have and I'll add your name to the list.
I have, now.
Nicely crafted. but I do think I had the info I needed to vote, from the
And I am not arguing that J2 is not "better", in some sense. But I am
concluding that the normal rules for better don't apply here.
There is some other syntactical aim here that I wouldn't call "sugar". Once
again, in the context of "decorators", we might need a new word to express
what the intention is here.
If a core argument in favor is to shortcut programmer input, I think it
should be expressed as an unadorned shortcut. And think @ expresses the
intent, in this respect more baldly and clearly.
Put me as against.
It should clinch it for you ;)
More information about the Python-list