Alternative decorator syntax decision
nid_oizo at yahoo.com_removethe_
Fri Aug 20 14:07:59 CEST 2004
Anthony Baxter wrote:
>>- Not Pythonic. It's a line without a block (like try/finally) that
>>affects a following line of code. It breaks interactive shells.
> I've seen this mentioned a couple of times, but as far as I can see,
> it's really not true:
I just copied from Wiki honestly.
> This form (decorators inside the block) has been pretty convincingly
> ruled out by Guido. I think the "last man standing" is the decorator-before-def
> form, I really doubt you're going to convince people that the form inside the
> function is workable.
I sadly discovered after my post it has been ruled out. I agree the
"last man standing" is the decorator-before-def form. In fact, we
should make a thread about only this proposal.
More information about the Python-list