decorator J4 - any objections?

[Nicolas Fleury]

Martin DeMello wrote:
> Perhaps J2 but with proposal L to call the decorator declaration
> something other than "decorate" - 'using' is the best I've seen so far,
> though it's still not perfect. Or another idea - how about inverting the
> meaning of 'as', and changing the form of the decorator declarations
> slightly? 
> 
> as:
>   classmethod
>   memoised
>   accepting (int, int)
>   returning (float)
> def foo(bar, baz):

But Guido already said he wanted to keep as for other meanings.

Regards,
Nicolas