Python milestone releases
outpost at rumblefish.org
Fri Aug 6 16:53:09 CEST 2004
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 11:54:27 +1000, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> I'm not sure how "2.3" isn't a milestone in any way that's meaningful.
For programmers, I agree.
But for other people (server admins etc.), I think, the following
would be important:
- First of all, it should be mentioned somewhere (in a prominent place,
such that even first-time visitors of python.org can find it easily).
- Not every release should be a milestone release;
milestones should not come more often than maybe every 2 years.
(E.g. 2.0 and 2.3 would have been good candidates IMO.)
And -even for programmers- the following could be important:
- Some kind of support would be needed for the milestone releases,
even after the release of other -non-milestone- Python versions;
(e.g. bug fixes, backports of important new packages).
Martin v. Löwis describes in his follow-up to my original posting, that
some of the above did hold for Python 2.2. (But, actually, I was not aware
More information about the Python-list