Alternative decorator syntax decision

[Doug Holton]

> Exactly. From this standpoint, the list on the wiki should be filtered 
> to something that
>   1) doesn't have the declaration in the body of the function
>   2) doesn't have the declaration following the parameters
> 
> 1) rules out D1 D2 E1 E2
> 2) rules out C1 C2 C3 C4 E3

I don't think so.  C1 was the clear community favorite for months and 
still has many supporters.  And putting the decorator at the top of the 
function had many supporters in the poll last week.

> With the voting going the way it currently is J2 is winning anyway, 

J2 is winning because it was actively discussed right here on this 
newsgroup this past week.  When I did a poll last week, E1 had just been 
actively discussed and it gained a lot of support.  Next week who knows 
what will be the current flavor?