Tim Peters wrote: > [beliavsky at aol.com] >>Is there a list of expected incompatibilities with Python 2.3? > > No. PEP 3000 doesn't count? Actually, PEP 3000 should be taken with a (large) grain of salt, since it's only updated somewhat irregularly - but it's the closest thing I know of to a proposed feature list for Py3K/3.0. Cheers, Nick.