Python 3000 and "Python Regrets"

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at email.com
Sat Dec 4 00:57:43 CET 2004


Tim Peters wrote:
> [beliavsky at aol.com]
>>Is there a list of expected incompatibilities with Python 2.3?
> 
> No.

PEP 3000 doesn't count?

Actually, PEP 3000 should be taken with a (large) grain of salt, since it's only 
updated somewhat irregularly - but it's the closest thing I know of to a 
proposed feature list for Py3K/3.0.

Cheers,
Nick.



More information about the Python-list mailing list