A rational proposal

[Nick Coghlan]

Mike Meyer wrote:
> Well, you want to be able to add floats to rationals. The results
> shouldn't be rational, for much the same reason as you don't want to
> convert floats to rationals directly. I figure the only choice that
> leaves is that the result be a float. That and float(rational) should
> be the only times that a rational gets turned into a float.
> 
> Are you suggestiong that float(rational) should be a string, with the
> number of degrees of precesion set by something like the Context type
> in Decimal?

Actually, I was misremembering how Decimal worked - it follows the rule you suggest:

float() + Decimal() fails with a TypeError
float() + float(Decimal()) works fine

And I believe Decimal's __float__ operation is a 'best effort' kind of thing, so 
I have no problem with Rationals working the same way.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at email.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net