tjreedy at udel.edu
Sat Dec 18 21:45:13 CET 2004
"Alex Martelli" <aleaxit at yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1goxmng.1edap1z1cok1cnN%aleaxit at yahoo.com...
> for item in alist:
> if isnasty(item):
> changing the header to ``in alist[:]:'' or ``in list(alist):'' probably
> makes this code work, but it still can't make it GOOD... good would be:
> alist[:] = [item for item in alist if not isnasty(item)]
Given that the OP has verified that replacing alist with list(alist) in the
for statement solves his problems, I agree that the listcomp is even nicer
in that it avoids the bug trap, the over-copying of the entire list, the
alternative of iterating in reverse, and the n**2 behavior of multiple
correct deletes from a long list.
Terry J. Reedy
More information about the Python-list