Complementary language?

[Cameron Laird]

In article <41CEAEAC.8050004 at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>,
Robin Becker  <robin at SPAMREMOVEjessikat.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
			.
			.
			.
>interesting, but not unique features. From the outside it seems 
>difficult to say whether say "distributed programming" is uniquely 
>easily implemented in Oz or whether it's something like pyro built using 
>more primitive constructs.
			.
			.
			.
>I agree entirely with this last, but this is about language comparisons 
>and if we're being objective we need to do some measurements. If this is 
>impossible then discussion reduces to 'my language is better than yours' 
>which is pretty futile.
			.
			.
			.
"... distributed ...", "mine is better than yours", and
complements Python:  'sounds like Erlang <URL:
http://phaseit.net/claird/comp.lang.functional/Erlang.html >
to me.