Python Docs. Hardcopy 2.4 Library Reference, interested?

[Paul Rubin]

"Brad Clements" <bkc at Murkworks.com> writes:
> Is anyone interested in purchasing a hardcopy version of the Python 2.4
> Library reference?
> 
> That is, assuming it was NOT  a direct print of current html/pdf versions.
> 
> So, nicely formatted for a printed book (spiral bound probably), with
> several indexes as appropriate, or perhaps a permutted index.
> 
> I'm thinking about doing this through lulu.com or cafepress, but it's going
> to take a lot of work to make a really nice printed version of the library
> reference from the LaTex source files (even via sgmlconv). Also wondering if
> I can get bleeds from either of these sites.

I don't see any point to doing that work.  The pdfs look good enough.
I have my own laser printer so I don't think I'd buy a printed copy of
the pdf's, but someone without a printer might find it worthwhile, and
I might buy it if I only had my old inkjet printer.  I wouldn't pay
extra for nicer formatting though.

I haven't felt so far like I needed hardcopy (except for some Tkinter
I downloaded, where a printed copy was very helpful).  What I really
want is better documentation, not nicer printing of the existing docs.