lies about OOP

John Roth newsgroups at
Tue Dec 14 04:46:35 CET 2004

Try comp.object.

John Roth

"projecktzero" <projecktzero at> wrote in message 
news:1102995205.949964.76020 at
>I know this might not be the correct group to post this, but I thought
> I'd start here.
> A co-worker considers himself "old school" in that he hasn't seen the
> light of OOP.(It might be because he's in love with Perl...but that's
> another story.) He thinks that OOP has more overhead and is slower than
> programs written the procedural way. I poked around google, but I don't
> know the magic words to put in to prove or disprove his assertion. Can
> anyone point me toward some resources?
> We do web programming. I suspect that OO apps would behave as good as
> procedural apps, and you'd get the benefit of code reuse if you do it
> properly. Code reuse now consists of cutting and pasting followed by
> enough modification that I wonder if it was worth it to cut and paste
> in the first place.
> Thanks.

More information about the Python-list mailing list