package similar to XML::Simple
brian at sweetapp.com
Tue Feb 10 22:46:39 CET 2004
> I suspect it's still somewhat ahead of a lot of other
> "XML parsers" anyway, though clearly imperfect and arguably not yet
> deserving of the label "XML parser".
Then they are not XML parsers either. I know that libxml passes the W3C XML
> I wonder whether this has been reported as a bug to Reportlab,
> however. Maybe they simply didn't happen to have a test case that
> covered that particular use of the parser... and they might be happy
> to fix it.
The errors message "not a valid 8-bit XML character" suggests that there is
more at work here than a simple bug.
More information about the Python-list