Python vs. Io

Daniel Ehrenberg LittleDanEhren at yahoo.com
Sun Feb 1 03:08:15 CET 2004


> Do you know why the creator of IO decided not to use the now-ubiquitous 
> "." operator? I don't know whether I can define a "." operator that has 
> the appropriate behaviour but that wouldn't help anyhow.
> 
>   Paul Prescod

In the opinion of the creators of Io, a space looked cleaner. Using a
period looks kinda like you're finishing a sentence and starting a new
one. Consider the following syntaxes:

Dog barks //Io
Dog.barks() #Python

Regardless of which one is more common, which looks more like
language?
You say that "." is more ubiquitous, but "{}" is more ubiquitous than
":" by far, yet Python uses the latter and we don't complain. (note
that in Io, unlike other languages with similar syntax such as Ruby,
functions are first class objects.)

Daniel Ehrenberg



More information about the Python-list mailing list