Databases: Which one's right for me?
tim.one at comcast.net
Mon Jan 12 16:45:56 CET 2004
> Reading the blog it seems you are right. I wish zodb would be
> a bit more careful in its claims. When you say "zodb supports
> the ACID properties of transactions" this has a precise meaning
> which vanishes when you redefine all the letters.
I haven't made a claim about what ZODB does, I've just pointed you to what
others have said about it. I'm not sure what you're referring to here, but
guess it's probably taken from:
If so, the meanings it intends for each letter are given there. I don't
means that two programs or threads running in two different
transactions cannot see each other's changes until they
commit their transactions.
misrepresents what ZODB does.
> In particular it suggests that zodb would be good for something
> like an accounting or banking application which would require strict
> transaction isolation (serializability). The looser definition
> could lead to fairly unpleasant difficulties (law suits, jail
> time...). Sorry, had to complete my thought on clp.
Would the text above imply "strict transaction isolation (serializability)"
to such a programmer? If so, it probably ought to change.
More information about the Python-list