Why learn Python ??
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Tue Jan 13 06:38:37 EST 2004
claird at lairds.com (Cameron Laird) writes:
> In article <877jzwg1v2.fsf at pobox.com>, John J. Lee <jjl at pobox.com> wrote:
> .
> [pages of marvelously
> precise analysis]
> .
> .
> >Eiffel: Design by contract. The book to read is Meyer's "Object-
> > Oriented Software Construction". Full of interesting stuff, if you can
> > stand his self-importance ;-).
> .
> .
> .
> Mostly I'm writing just to applaud--this post had a lot
> of value to it. The largest quibble I could find in its
> scores of lines was the failure to mention that *OOSC*
> is valuable reading for OO programmers working in *any*
> language, not just Eiffel. *OOSC* is like *SICP* in
> that regards; it towers not just over the competition,
> but also any apparent limit imposed by its language of
> expression.
I would also say that OOSC is one of those books that's at least as
interesting when it's *wrong* than when it's right.
Cheers,
mwh
--
You sound surprised. We're talking about a government department
here - they have procedures, not intelligence.
-- Ben Hutchings, cam.misc
More information about the Python-list
mailing list